Select Page

Blog

Delaware General Corporation Law Blockchain Amendments: Where Are We Now?
Megan McCulloch

Yev Muchnik

April 27, 2020

In 2017, the Delaware Blockchain Initiative demonstrated that regulation could be synchronous with technological innovation, leading the way, apropos Delaware style. However, it is 2020 and not much has changed-—what gives?

Delaware, being the corporate domicile of choice for many private and public companies incorporated in the US, led the way in becoming the first state to allow companies to use blockchain technology in their corporate governance functions. Delaware regulators made a bold move to modernize the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) by allowing companies to utilize distributed electronic networks or databases (through smart contract functionality) to meet basic corporate governance requirements, such as maintaining corporate books and records, such as cap table management, proxy voting, and dividend distributions.

Blockchain, a type of distributed ledger technology, allows for the immutable tracking of ownership of an asset (e.g. stock) without the need for third-party verification.

 The amendments to the DGCL produced the solution that all technologically forward companies had been craving—efficiency, transparency, accuracy, and speed embodied into a body of legal corporate infrastructure. Greatest thing since sliced bread?

Yet, the signaling from the existing infrastructure is clear—they’re still not ready. Widespread adoption has not occurred. While the current system is lacking, as illustrated in In re Appraisal of Dell, Inc., the resistance to change by market participants has not yielded the technology driven corporate governance solution initially envisioned by legislators.

Summary of the Delaware Blockchain Amendments

Sections 219 and 224 of the DGCL were amended to permit a corporation to rely on the contents of a distributed ledger itself as the stock ledger. Section 219(c) of the DGCL defines “stock ledger” to include “one or more records administered by or on behalf of the corporation.” Section 224 provides that any records “administered by or on behalf of the corporation” may be “one or more distributed electronic networks or databases.”

The amended statutes provide that any distributed ledger used for corporate record keeping must be able to:

  • Prepare the corporation’s list of shareholders as required by Section 219 and 220, which pertain to shareholder demands to inspect books and records;
  • Record information specified in DGCL Sections 156 (consideration for partly paid for shares), 159 (transfer of shares for collateral security), 217(a) (pledged shares) and 218 (voting trusts); an
  • Record share transfers governed by Article 8 of the Delaware Uniform Commercial Code.

Notwithstanding, companies must still be able to produce paper records when requested to do so.

Section 232 of the DGCL allows communications to shareholders to be made via distributed electronic networks or databases, including those required by a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws, or other provisions of the DGCL.

Benefits of Implementing Blockchain Technology for Governance

  • Tracking share ownership: recording share ownership can get complicated as a corporation grows due to a variety of factors, such as share transfers, lost certificates, human error in issuing the same certificate number to multiple recipients, corporate transactions, or intestate ownership. By using a distributed ledger, each issuance and transfer of a digital asset (share) is recorded on a blockchain, and the owner of an asset may only transfer it by using digital cryptographic keys to authenticate the transaction. Properly configured blockchain records are immutable and nearly impossible to tamper with.
  • Shareholder voting: shareholder voting may be done via an electronic network, which can be more efficient, immediate, and accurate than traditional paper or even e-signature voting. This also allows for accurate and accessible historical voting records. Further, determining share ownership for purposes of determining voting eligibility and setting record dates may be done with greater ease.
  • Enforcing share transfer restrictions: transfers may be powered by smart contracts on the blockchain, thus making their enforcement easier and less costly.
  • Communications with shareholders: by utilizing blockchain technology for required communications, a corporation can ensure timely communication as well as accurate record keeping of communications made.

All of these applications bring with them the added benefit of simplifying due diligence for any future corporate transactions, such as fundraising, M&A, sale, exit, etc. Rather than having to comb through onerous and disorganized files of corporate records seeking the most up to date ownership records, one need only look to the records validated by blockchain technology.

Practical Considerations

While utilizing distributed ledger technology may sound like an excellent solution to many of the common pain points of corporate governance, it should be noted that implementing electronic networks may be prohibitively expensive for a startup. This includes not only the technology itself but also the costs associated with ensuring compliance with any applicable laws and educating shareholders and potential investors on the benefits and uses of such a system.

One easy and practical step a newly formed Delaware c-corporation may take is to adopt uncertificated shares from the very beginning (as opposed to the traditional method of issuing share certificates). This is because if a corporation wishes to use distributed ledger technology for tracking share ownership, any outstanding physical certificates would be outside the purview of the electronic network and would thus render it incomplete.

If an already existing corporation wishes to migrate to an electronic network and has currently outstanding physical certificates, this does not mean it cannot still switch over. While the DGCL does not currently provide a corporation with the power to require shareholders to convert certificates to uncertificated shares, if a corporation can persuade all shareholders to do so, then those certificates – once surrendered – may be converted to uncertificated shares. The corporation would also need to adopt a board resolution requiring the conversion to all uncertificated shares and ensure that the switch is consistent with applicable Delaware law.

Final Thoughts

While Delaware has once again led the way in providing an ideal ecosystem for businesses to succeed, the market has shown since the adoption of the Blockchain Amendments that is it simply not ready to utilize this technology in any significant way. One major reason for this may be nothing more sinister than the burden of having to explain to potential investors and shareholders the benefits of using the technology in day-to-day corporate functions.

As blockchain technology becomes more accepted and commonly used in our society, this hurdle may organically disappear, and when it does, Delaware corporations will be ready.

 

About the Authors

Megan McCulloch

Megan is a corporate attorney in Denver Colorado, specializing in private equity fundraising and securities compliance for startup companies and real estate syndication, contract review and drafting, legal research and writing, and more. 

Yev Muchnik

Yev Muchnik is a corporate attorney in Denver, Colorado. She advises small and growing businesses across a variety of industries, including blockchain, healthtech, agtech, edtech, fintech, space and energy.

Get In Touch

McCulloch law, LLC

3900 E. Mexico Ave., Suite 300, denver, CO 80210

startuplaw@megan mcculloch.com

Megan McCulloch, Esq.

3900 E. Mexico Ave., Suite 300,

Denver, CO 80210

startuplaw@meganmcculloch.com